Sometimes the Mishna the facts of the Mishna are more compelling and insightfull than the proposition they seek to demonstrate. On 86A, the Mishna gives the exampe of a man who leaves his home for Shabbat without contributing to the Eruv for the Chatzer (combined homes). The question is : does his failure to contribute restrict the usage and carrying of other in the Chatzer. The Mishna gives an answer, only if he goes to his daughter in law.

What a great Mishna, first what a great lesson that the Chatzer is dependent on all the residents. All people are critical and necessary. But the second piece is pricelss. Read the Mishna and Gemara to find out what the Mishna thinks of a daughter v. a daughter in law. You are not afraid of a son-in law, but you are afraid of a daughter in law. Read it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s